Tate Modern: Art strikes back

The Times reports: “A crack in the floor which forms Tate Modern’s latest installation has claimed its first casualties.” Eek!

How scared should we be?

Three visitors lost their footing and fell into the gap made by Doris Salcedo’s art work.

They were among more than 12,000 people who viewed the installation, which runs the full 167 metres (548 feet) of the Turbine Hall.

The Tate said the trio did not sustain serious injuries.

(The Times)

So what is this crack o’danger all about? Is it a bigger threat to public safety than the mountains of warehouse-reject boxes? Or the, um, weather thing? Or those awesome slides?

The Guardian explains:

The work by Colombian sculptor Doris Salcedo, entitled Shibboleth, runs the full 167 metres (548 feet) of the cavernous hall. It begins as a hairline crack in the concrete floor of the building, then widens and deepens as it snakes across the room.


“What is important is the meaning of the piece. The making of it is not important,” [the artist] said. Asked how deep the fissure goes, she replied: “It’s bottomless. It’s as deep as humanity.”


“It represents borders, the experience of immigrants, the experience of segregation, the experience of racial hatred,” she said. “The space which illegal immigrants occupy is a negative space. And so this piece is a negative space.”

Right. Negative indeed if it’s wrongfooting the poor public! So, what are the Tate people going to do to save unwary Londoners and tourists from the bottomless depths of humanity’s evils? (How many times have we asked that question this month??)

“Tate staff are monitoring the space carefully to ensure the safety of our visitors.

“Tate has a lot of experience handling complex installations and visitor safety. We have thought carefully about visitor safety, working closely with Southwark Council and there are measures in place. There are no plans to barrier off the work at this stage.”

Tate staff are on hand with leaflets warning about the dangers of getting too close to the piece.

Gallery attendants have also been instructed to give verbal advice to visitors.

(The Times)

Well that’s okay then.

Let us give thanks to Unilever for sponsoring such larks in the Turbine Hall over the years. Perhaps the crack could also symbolise how bereft of art our lives would be if sponsorship didn’t exist? I’m thinking of you, The Times BFI 51st London Film Festival. Rolls off the tongue, non?

Published by


I like the comma in American headlines, I think England needs it.

7 thoughts on “Tate Modern: Art strikes back

  1. Darn! I had a crush on his arse. I’m curious to the point of absurdity. Not that any of this matters in the least. Oh well. 🙂


  2. I actually have been there, a friend lived there and we went back for her birthday… all I remember is being very drunk unfortunately…


  3. Oh, you’re most welcome! Thanks for linking me, too! So jealous you live in London. Have you ever been to St Albans? I once had a professor who hailed from there…

    Crack really is wack…

    : )


  4. Anners!

    I really should have called this post “Crack is wack,” dammit… I am definitely going to go to the Yawning Chasm exhibit, I love the Tate Modern.

    Loving your blog too and thanks for the link!


  5. Ooh, I love news from London! Are you going to see this exhibit? Crack is wack! I love how artists do stuff like this. I wanna go. I want to go to the British Museum the most, though!




Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s